tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23922072104501218142024-03-13T09:03:10.202+00:00Someday you and I will live on the moonRChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-67137270583450139672018-06-14T07:57:00.002+01:002018-06-14T07:57:55.673+01:00Rocket yoga and your heart rate - part 1Out of curiosity, I've been wearing a heart rate monitor to yoga classes for the past six weeks. I've got lots to say about all the data I'm gathering, but first I'm just going to show what my heart rate is doing over a typical rocket yoga practice.<br />
<br />
Some background information about rocket yoga and my general level of fitness first. 'The Rocket' is a fast paced practice with plenty of inversions and challenging sequences which initially seem absurd but quickly become addictive. I've been practising rocket about 2-3 times per week for a few years and qualified as a teacher last summer, but I would describe my practice as 'approaching competence' rather than 'advanced'. I used to do triathlons and play football, but these days yoga and cycling to work is the only exercise I get. My resting heart rate is around 50 beats per minute (bpm), which is apparently pretty good (i.e. low) for a 36 year old.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLX2HwjVcqoBkcOBhJfHPheNGaO15p1F-Rz0w0QLoYrQCG1AmCMZaHdnnriKqACWaenRs2T-ZVzSQ-p7GFQ7_zAPts6W3lj_l56N14i2xGmfF_vRARzsFp55NhCBKEJ15I1tKXjdbUDbk/s1600/selection.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="472" data-original-width="410" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLX2HwjVcqoBkcOBhJfHPheNGaO15p1F-Rz0w0QLoYrQCG1AmCMZaHdnnriKqACWaenRs2T-ZVzSQ-p7GFQ7_zAPts6W3lj_l56N14i2xGmfF_vRARzsFp55NhCBKEJ15I1tKXjdbUDbk/s320/selection.png" width="277" /></a></div>
Yesterday morning I practiced at home, the picture on the left shows my heart rate from start to finish. <span style="text-align: center;">How hard am I working here? Well, pretty hard. My aerobic zone (about 120-145bpm) can be considered 'moderate' effort and I'm there for around 14 minutes. But I spend 28 minutes working 'hard' (in my anaerobic zone, 145-165bpm) and nearly 3 minutes working 'extremely hard' (the red speed/power zone, over 165 bpm, or 90% of my max heart rate). I burnt 760 calories, even though I spent the first 9 minutes doing very little and the last 10 minutes lying on my back. In short, it was a proper workout.</span><br />
<br />
You might be wondering what I was doing at the peak? Well, although handstand and some other arm balances got my heart rate up, you can see about 90 seconds into the clip below it was a relatively innocuous looking pose that had my heart pumping the hardest.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OCR82fO5TA8/0.jpg" src="?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<div class="" style="clear: both;">
<br />
I don't know if my heart rate climbs in Anjaneyasana because I'm back bending, because it's towards the end of the standing sequence or because my arms are above my head and I have tight shoulders. I also don't know what the data would look like for someone with more or less yoga experience, or how it compares to other kinds of exercise for a similar period of time. This is all stuff I intend to write about in future posts.</div>
<br />RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-48397621459834159982012-10-21T23:35:00.001+01:002012-10-22T13:18:02.707+01:00"Why do you even play football?"SBFC 3 Fishponds Town 1<br />
<br />
FC Bristol South 5 SBFC 4<br />
<br />
Legion 3 SBFC 3<br />
<br />
Quayside 2 SBFC 8<br />
<br />
As some of you know, I asked for a private word with today's ref after the final whistle. I told him I thought some of the challenges we received were plain reckless and he could have done more to stop them. I'm not accusing Quayside of anything malicious, it's just a fact that in Sunday League, tackles are mistimed for the same reason most 25-yard volleys go absolutely nowhere near the goal. That reason is that most of us are shit at football.<br />
<br />
There's a tendency among some refs to shrug their shoulders at the shambolic tackling at our level, to just dismiss it as part of the amateur game. But the lower level of defensive skill means the refs have to exercise more control, not less. A hilariously sliced volley is harmless, but an unskilled centre-back hurling all 13st of himself, studs up, at the standing leg of a winger isn't funny, it's just dangerous.<br />
<br />
Credit to the ref, he let me make my point before condescending me into another dimension.<br />
<br />
"How long you been playing the game?"<br />
<br />
He asked me this knowing full well, as a 60 year-old man, that he would have been refereeing longer than any number I could tell him. So, I reminded him that I was being polite and that if he disagreed with me, that was fair enough but there was no need to be a prick about it. Undeterred, he continued with his line of argument.<br />
<br />
"I've been reffing 25 years and I have the experience to know when something is dangerous or not."<br />
<br />
I said what happened 20 years ago had nothing do do with it, you're not allowed to jump into tackles anymore. If I were getting 40 grand a week, then maybe I'd risk a broken leg, but for an amateur game to be played like this was just crazy. He then asked me a question I've been thinking about all afternoon.<br />
<br />
"Why do you even play football?"<br />
<br />
At the time it didn't really register, I just thanked him for letting me make my point and wished him an enjoyable Sunday afternoon. It was only later that this question struck me as odd. Was the ref really saying that if I was worried about one of my teammates getting seriously injured, I shouldn't even bother turning up? That's like complaining to the waiter that you've been served raw chicken, only for him to ask "Why do you even go to restaurants?"<br />
<br />
More on this later, but I suppose I had better talk about how SBFC have been getting on first.<br />
<br />
A few weeks ago now, SBFC gave the 10 ten men of Fishponds Town an exhibition of passing verve and profligacy. Jack Britton opened the scoring early doors, latching on to a neat through ball from Andrew Morris and finishing with 'aplomb', whatever that is. SBFC then proceeded to spurn one chance after another, as opposed to spurning all their chances at the same time, which is physically impossible. <br />
<br />
Eventually, Dave scored a couple of penalties. He didn't kick them very hard though. If they'd have been saved, Alan Shearer would have called them 'bad penalties'. But they went in, so Shearer would have called them 'good penalties', had he seen them. Then Shearer would have grinned 'A good penalty is one that goes in', seemingly making an ironic joke about his inability to take his own analysis to an abstract level. This would be a clever thing for Alan Shearer to do, so if he ever does it, this isn't what he actually means because the man is a fucking idiot and anything clever he ever says is an accident.<br />
<br />
The week after we lost 5-4 to FC Bristol South. I don't really remember much about this game except that at one point I tried to clear a corner, but all I did was kick the ball vertically upwards into my own face. At the second attempt I then hoofed it 50 yards to Colin, which may have been the furthest I have ever kicked a ball. <br />
<br />
I went off at 70 mins and then went round telling everyone my pass completion rate was 100%, which I genuinely thought was true at the time. I then remembered a couple of misplaced passes and felt quite embarrassed about going round boasting about my 100% pass completion rate like some sort of madman when it wasn't even true. <br />
<br />
Their last 2 goals were pretty good strikes and we can't really complain about losing the game, not that I really remember much of it. According to the spreadsheet Steff and Ben Wyatt both scored (I have some recollection of this being a good goal Ben?). Dave got a penalty. If anyone has any memories to add, please do so in the comments below.<br />
<br />
On to our away game against the league leaders, Legion. We didn't win, but I think this was one the best SBFC performances I have been a part of. We were competitive and passed the ball well against a very good side. We had no Dave or Jack, but everyone on the pitch stepped up and played with skill and courage. <br />
<br />
SBFC's first goal was magnificent. Sam Bebbington, who has been having an excellent season so far, made a great intercepting header from a threatening Legion long ball. Raj picked it up in midfield and nudged a short pass to Andrew Morris who had time to turn and play a superb ball through the defence to SBFC's notoriously aggressive right-winger Colin. After a bit of high-paced jiggery-pokery, Colin whipped in a cross with such ferocity that Ben Wyatt didn't have time to get his instep under the ball and lift it over the bar as usual, and much to his own disgust, scored from short range. <br />
<br />
Lovey stuff, Saints in front. <br />
<br />
Legion's 'little man with a big attitude', Turbo, then scored a clever back-heel flick from a cross that should never been allowed to skid into the box the way it did. The SBFC of old would probably have folded at this stage. As ever, the opposition were more physical, but did that mean they 'wanted it more'? No, no, a thousand times 'no'. Well, three times 'no' really. Four if you count that last one.<br />
<br />
Anyway, Legion gave away a moronic free-kick on the D. Now, the whole point of the D is that it marks 10 yards from the penalty spot so the ref can make sure no defending player is within 10 yards of the ball when the penalty is taken. So, the Legion wall should have been on the penalty spot right? No, not according to the ref. When I pointed out this simple fact to him he said <br />
<br />
"I've called my ten yards, now walk away".<br />
<br />
BUT, BUT, BUT...<br />
<br />
So while I was getting pissed off about that, Steff calmly sent the ball over the wall and into the top right corner. 10 yards, 6 yards... whatever... it's all the same to the man they call 'A Wizard'.<br />
<br />
Turbo then demanded his teammates 'up the tempo' and 'box us in' by getting all of Legion's players to stand in the SBFC half for our goal-kick. This odd decision was exploited by SBFC when Ellis picked it up in midfield and needed only to poke the ball past the Legion defensive line so that Steff could collect it in acres of space. Steff sent the keeper left with his eyes and slotted the ball neatly into the recently vacated centre of the goal.<br />
<br />
Four minutes to go and 3-1 up, good times. But Legion scored twice and it was 3-all. Turbo, and Legion in general, are quite annoying, but he and they are quite good at football. Fair play to them. Bailey was Man of the Match after making a string/host/plethora of superb saves.<br />
<br />
Finally, today's 8-2 demolition of Quayside. SBFC played some smashing stuff at times, lots of crisp, short passing and clever movement. Colin had a magic game up front. A triffic game. A top, top game, but Andrew Morris was Man of the Match after bitchslapping Quayside till they begged for mercy. Their beg for mercy took an unusual form, mainly just a series of daft sliding tackles, but I know begging for mercy when I see it.<br />
<br />
I can't quite remember the sequence of goals, but I'm pretty sure the almost perfectly cubic hairy-hat-trick-hero Sam Greenwood was first. Sam G, as nobody calls him, has fitted in to the SBFC squad like an old-lady with a slipped disc getting into a hot bath. It's taken a bit of time, but... errrmmm... fuck I dunno. I've been writing this for an hour now. Complete the analogy yourselves. Big-ups, shout-outs and wet kisses to Ben Mudge for his strong performance and first 90 minutes of the season and to Steff for nobly volunteering to play in goal.<br />
<br />
Highlight of the game, for me anyway, was one of Andrew's goals. I picked it up inside the SBFC half, beat one of Quayside's midfielders and played it through to Dave, who then played it back to me. Playing a 1-2 with Dave is like playing Swingball with Roger Federer. You're kidding yourself if you really think you're contributing to the flow of the moment, but I enjoyed it anyway. So, collecting the ball 15 yards inside the opposition half, I looked up and slid an inch perfect pass between the centre-backs to Andrew Morris who finished superbly. <br />
<br />
In the context of the game, it was pretty meaningless, we had already won at that stage. But, it was probably the most satisfying thing I have ever done on a football pitch. I'm not blessed with a particular talent for football, I mainly play because despite my ineptitude, I enjoy the game. Sometimes when we're getting beaten or if I'm playing awfully, I wonder why I bother, but then once in every dozen games I execute a moment of creativity, probably just as well as a professional would have done. <br />
<br />
Sure, Sunday League football is pointless. But then even winning the Champions League is pointless if you want to be a prick about it. We're all still going to die. One day the pitches upon which we play will probably be a post-apocalyptic nuclear dust-bowl and nothing any of us will have done will be remembered by anyone. But that's not the point. To master your surroundings, even for just a few seconds, is something to savour. To do it in the company of teammates that you genuinely enjoy playing with makes it all the more special.<br />
<br />
Why do I play football?<br />
<br />
What a stupid question.RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-90450333796319242792012-09-16T22:00:00.001+01:002012-09-16T22:07:44.696+01:00HCC 1 SBFC 3"The gods had condemned Sisyphus to ceaselessly rolling a rock to the top of a mountain, whence the stone would fall back of its own weight. They had thought, with some reason, that there is no more dreadful punishment than futile and hopeless labor. But the struggle itself towards the heights is enough to fill a man's heart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy." - Albert Camus<br />
<br />
<a href="http://coconutheadsets.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sisyphus.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://coconutheadsets.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sisyphus.jpg" width="285" /></a>I often find myself, during games, sliding into a deep trance as Dave's hypnotic hips turn him round and round in ever smaller circles. I get a better vantage point than most, a few yards behind him and about ten to his side, but I'm told wherever you are on the pitch, it's a beautiful sight. <br />
<br />
"Look at that!" I think to myself, while I'm probably meant to be doing something useful.<br />
<br />
But the joy doesn't last long, because nine times out of ten, Dave's endeavors will have been in vain and then he will scowl. Or swear in Italian, while doing that thing that Italians do where they look like they're holding an imaginary hand puppet up to their chin. Then, I feel guilty for my pleasure, like I've just been applauding an elephant that can walk on its hind legs, only to notice tears in it's eyes.<br />
<br />
At moments like these, I remember the legend of King Sisyphus and feel like the sort of fool who applauds each journey up the hill, entirely missing the point that I am witnessing a man condemned to eternal torture. But then tonight I came across that quote from Camus and I thought 'well, at least Dave is consumed by an emotion strong enough to make him feel alive'. This is not a consolation as such, but I suppose I can rest easy knowing that on some level, Dave's soul is at peace.<br />
<br />
So yeah, we played football earlier, a cup match against a side from the league below us. It was alright, a good game. We were a bit cocky beforehand, I heard someone say "Yeah, they're shit, but we're not good at playing shit teams, we might only beat them four nil or something."<br />
<br />
So, we were looking pretty stupid when they took the lead early in the first half from a 25 yard speculative half volley. It got worse and we had to ride out a 15 minute period when we were almost totally incapable of making even the simplest passes to each other. We did well to stay in the game and our stand in keeper, Jim, did brilliantly to tip a header over the bar from one of their many corners.<br />
<br />
Then, for no particular reason, SBFC remembered that it is easier to score goals if you pass the ball to people on the same team as you. We finished the first half much improved from the first half of the first half because in the second half of the first half we were better than we were in the beginning of the first half which was the beginning of the match when we weren't playing so well.<br />
<br />
A constructive half time brought about a slight rejig of the midfield and an agreement to get the ball wider, faster. This strategy of the midfielders passing it to the attackers who then kick the ball into the goal reaped immediate dividends. Something weird happened up there between Colin and Steff which ended up with the ball in the net. It's hard for me to give more details (please feel free to add your comments below), I was quite a long way away.<br />
<br />
1-1 became 2-1, mainly because we then scored another goal. Raj Chande ran on to an HCC clearance ten yards inside their half and slid a no-look reverse pass to an unmarked Steff who took one touch and finished with aplomb. It was a lovely goal and would have looked fantastic from the camera that they usually keep just inside the post.<br />
<br />
The game then turned a bit scrappy and SBFC probably should have scored another. SBFC defended well, Sam Bebbington made an excellent defensive header with about 20 minutes left. There was a lot of long-ball-back-and-forth nonsense and that's when Dave started getting a bit annoyed, but these things happen Dave. These things happen.<br />
<br />
Then came the most important moment of the match. HCC won a corner with one minute left on the clock. The keeper came up. THE KEEPER CAME UP! God it was exciting. It was a damned good corner too, flat and with pace, but Sam Hayhurst rose above the crowd and headed it to the edge of the box to Steff, who headed it on to Sam Greenwood, who then ran the length of pitch just about slowly enough for their keeper to get back to his goal, before sliding the ball into the net.<br />
<br />
3-1, SBFC go through to the next round.<br />
<br />
The End.RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-32384088934227926332012-09-16T18:50:00.000+01:002012-09-16T18:58:32.302+01:00SBFC 3 City South Farm 4This match report comes a week late for a few reasons, but mainly because every time I remember this game I smash my face against a wall until I pass out.<br />
<br />
First things first, City South Farm are good at what they do. They had a plan, they all knew what it was and they played to their strengths. So rigidly did they follow this plan that I spent the vast majority of the time I was on the pitch looking up at the sky as the ball sailed over my head towards their red faced front man.<br />
<br />
Indeed, their first goal was an excellent header to a cross brilliantly delivered from the half way line. I'm not sure anyone could have saved that, let alone our makeshift keeper James Carnevale (who did a great job in goal in the first half).<br />
<br />
St Bernadette's recovered well though I don't remember much of it now, maybe the repeated self-inflicted concussions to block out the memory of the defeat are to blame for that. But I do remember Colin Clements scoring an excellent goal to make it 2-1 to the good guys before the half time break.<br />
<br />
The second half was a load of boring bullshit. City South Farm played one long ball after another and swore a lot. Occasionally, the ball would ricochet into the St Bernadette's goal, but their goals were as much 'goals' as Chris Moyles' autobiography is a 'book'. Sure, all the components of a book are there. Words. Sentences. Pages that turn over to reveal yet more words and sentences. But, if you were in any way responsible for the creation of those pages, you'd have to immediately kill yourself by swallowing a cocktail of broken glass, bleach and shit.<br />
<br />
We did score a third, but I was looking the other way so I don't even know what happened really.<br />
<br />
Wasn't all bad though. It was a lovely sunny afternoon and I went to play a few games of ping pong and watch Dredd and it was alright I suppose though it's a shame they got locked in the building and that because it was interesting until then but maybe they will do that more in the sequel and also I won at ping pong.<br />
<br />
Fin<br />
<br />RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-35823785208710263262012-09-02T23:19:00.000+01:002012-09-03T00:16:53.166+01:00DKL Athletic 2 SBFC 6Questions. Questions. SBFC had questions to answer. Not the sort of question that a striker must ask of the keeper in a one-on-one situation. No, different questions to those. After Steffan Cole's controversial resignation following his unfortunate outburst on the disabled, reincarnation and karma, how would his successor Sam Hayhurst cope on his competitive managerial debut? How long would it take for the club's new signings to adapt to SBFC's passing ethos? Why is Bailey always naked?<br />
<br />
Today, those questions were answered. Except the last one.<br />
<br />
The pitch was not suited to SBFC's sophisticated playing style. Sure, in Sunday League football, the odd divot is to be expected. But this afternoon, the entire pitch was just one big divot, itself made up of thousands of smaller divots. The altitude drop from the touchline to the centre circle was so dramatic that several players complained of their ears popping during the revamped warm up. But warm up they did.<br />
<br />
Indeed, the all new warm up (which introduced the revolutionary concept of kicking the ball about a bit before the game actually started) immediately reaped dividends. DKL Athletic could only gawp on like the sort of simpletons who still point at aeroplanes as SBFC pinged the ball round the pitch with precision, enthusiasm and verve. DKL didn't take it lying down though and came up with the master strategy of appealing for "HANDBALL!!!" every 15 seconds.<br />
<br />
Surprisingly, the one-dimensional tactic of repeatedly claiming free-kicks failed to repel the SBFC onslaught and some tidy build up play led to Andrew Morris shimmying into the penalty box and squaring for Colin Clements to score SBFC's first goal of the season. Andrew Morris then added a second after some majestic centre-forward play from Ben Wyatt. Perhaps it's lazy for me to exploit Wyatt's obvious physical resemblance to the big Ivorian, but it was a truly Drogba-esque bit of play.<br />
<br />
I'm not sure exactly when DKL scored their first half goal (to make it 2-1 or 3-1?), but I'm not really going to talk about it anyway because it was shit. But, I had a lovely view of our third. I'm not quite sure why Colin was running towards me with the ball, but what a sight it was. Colin then dinked a left foot pass 20 yards, between 4 DKL players and into the path of Mike Malay who calmly slotted home. Sure, we all would have preferred it if he'd headed it home, but it was still pretty good.<br />
<br />
HT: DKL 1 SBFC 3<br />
<br />
The 2nd Half started with something of a spirited fightback from DKL who really upped their intensity. The "HANDBALL!!!" appeals were coming in thick and fast and tempers started to fray after a counterattacking Colin Clements refused to accept that he had run the ball out of play. The game and the human race as a whole was brought into disrepute as Colin petulantly kicked the ball a good 50 yards away.<br />
<br />
"I thought you whistled to say I should play on ref." smiled Colin.<br />
<br />
"He didn't think that. He's a fucking liar." said their slightly dimwitted number 9.<br />
<br />
DKL then nicked another and in fairness, they deserved it. SBFC need to find a way to cope with that kind of pressure, we just can't allow teams to keep appealing for "HANDBALL!!!" like that. As SBFC resumed the game, Raj Chande did what he does best and shouted some non-specific encouragement about 'concentration' and 'work-rates'. By golly did SBFC listen. No sooner had DKL pulled the game back to 3-2 than SBFC had restored the 2 goal margin which they had had previously in the half and also in the 1st half when they had been winning 2-0 which was what was happening earlier before this bit.<br />
<br />
And what a goal it was. Birthday boy David Amesbury and his perfectly square torso collected the ball deep into the DKL half, turned round and round in semi-circles before burying a left foot shot into the bottom right hand corner. DKL heads went down. DKL went quiet. DKL thought 'fuck this'.<br />
<br />
Then some other stuff happened but this is already quite long so I'm going to start winding it down. James Carnevale marked his debut with a goal, which is the only appropriate way to mark a debut really. Andrew Morris scored another goal from distance which isn't worth discussing in great detail because from where I was standing it looked like the keeper caught in and threw it into the goal.<br />
<br />
I haven't yet mentioned the Man of the Match, Ellis Jones, who started the game at Left Back, moved to Right Back and then ended up at Right Wing. He was bloody brilliant everywhere, composed on the ball and hard working without it. Ellis Jones is an example to us all and I am going to name all of my children Ellis Jones, regardless of their gender or how many I have and how confusing it gets.<br />
<br />
Later in the dressing room, Bailey was naked and there was some banter and everyone laughed and we all said 'well played' to each other and it was nice and then I went home and ate some chicken and some rice and some broccoli.<br />
<br />
RCRChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-3857058334401503432012-08-08T19:29:00.001+01:002012-08-08T19:32:47.745+01:00Footballers are amoral scumSo I'm watching the Olympics and reveling in its unbridled positivity and marveling at what a cracking bloke Sir Chris Hoy appears to be even with all his success and I'm thinking "God, aren't footballers a bunch of twats?"<br />
<br />
But then I thought about it a bit longer and I figured that Hoy doesn't complain to the ref because, well, there isn't one. Not one that influences what's happening during the sprint anyway. Then I thought, "Hoy doesn't dive either", but then it occurred to me that's because there wouldn't be any point.<br />
<br />
I'm not sure how everyone will react to the uglier side of football once the season resumes, I guess gobbing off at the ref will (briefly) be tolerated less than it was before the Olympics. That is of course absolutely a good thing. But I always find myself getting defensive on behalf of footballers themselves. I don't think these guys were born without the capacity to act morally and there are plenty of players who, generally speaking, compete pretty fairly.<br />
<br />
Pretty much all athletes, in any sport, are gaining an advantage any way they can. Some of them don't know when to stop and go too far. But cheating takes many forms, it's just that footballers cheat in an ugly way.<br />
<br />
Pretending to be hurt, pressuring officials, these are unpleasant ways to behave and many point to rugby as a shining example of sportsmanship. But, rugby is a sport where it appears perfectly acceptable to punch your opponent in the face or gouge their eyeballs, as long as you shake hands afterwards. It doesn't seem so much that football's critics have a problem with cheating, but rather that they just prefer the cheating takes some 'manly' form.<br />
<br />
I hate diving in football, though I hate two footed lunging tackles even more. I can't stand it that players aren't penalized for swearing at the refs and I think kids should be set a better example. But I also don't think that there is something wrong with footballers as a species, largely because they aren't a species. Most of them are responding to the incentives laid out in front of them. Those who still act honorably should be noted for doing so, much as clean Olympians are lauded for resisting the temptation of doping.<br />
<br />
Football has problems, but endemic drug problems and on field violence don't seem to be an issue. Maybe instead of talking about footballers, rugby players and athletes as different species, we should consider them all as human beings who succumb to temptation in different, but perhaps not so morally distinguishable ways.RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-31147895933208381792012-07-19T00:30:00.001+01:002012-07-19T09:25:20.407+01:00If You Can't Lose, You Can't WinLast night I watched a surprisingly brilliant <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01l1yl4/Victoria_Pendleton_Cyclings_Golden_Girl/" target="_blank">documentary</a> on Victoria Pendleton, reigning Olympic and World Sprint Cycling Champion. I say 'surprisingly brilliant' because I was expecting a tedious montage (which I still would have watched) of talking heads jabbering on about how driven Pendleton was as a little girl and how proud she was to win gold in Beijing and blah blah blah.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
But this really wasn't that. Within the first few minutes Pendleton despairs at being 'trapped in her own success' and says she's only ever competed to make other people happy. When she wins, all she feels is 'relief' at not having let them down. Not an obviously heartwarming start.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgxbMfwVajJwvlptdkxit-SzqtyJOgvwApkdzib0a23xbXOe4J8RcvaSutM-Q5vCHPd3JpzvQaAATNh1T4S2smS9aFe0KNBUjNsqIHPf5hCsIcavWJWIwqbTBdxWBRRJUD3teBwum7Gp48/s1600/Alan-Shearer-006.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="192" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgxbMfwVajJwvlptdkxit-SzqtyJOgvwApkdzib0a23xbXOe4J8RcvaSutM-Q5vCHPd3JpzvQaAATNh1T4S2smS9aFe0KNBUjNsqIHPf5hCsIcavWJWIwqbTBdxWBRRJUD3teBwum7Gp48/s320/Alan-Shearer-006.jpeg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Stupid and Boring</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Elite athletes often sound stupid and boring, but only because the journalists that interview them are, well, stupid and boring. This excuse cannot explain why Alan Shearer is so stupid and boring, as he<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2010/mar/12/alan-shearer-small-talk-interview" target="_blank"> appears to be stupid and boring regardless of context</a>. If Alan Shearer were alone in the woods and there was nobody there to hear him, he would still be stupid and boring.<br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white;">But this documentary was immediately compelling. There was very little of the usual 'It was hard, but I'm delighted to have won' guff that sports fans are usually forced to endure. Instead, we were given an insight into just how psychologically draining it is to be an Olympic athlete. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;">Pendleton could tell the viewers she rides 300 miles a week and leg presses 400kg every day and it would mean almost nothing to the rest of us. Those things sound difficult, but the vast majority of us have no conception of what those numbers actually mean. But when we're allowed to see that she's just a person, like us, who is terrified of failure and yet she still puts herself out there, year after year, even when winning doesn't make her happy (at least not in a way that we immediately understand)<i>... </i></span><span style="background-color: white;">then our jaws drop in admiration. Well, mine did anyway.</span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRDyQc5NwlP4KUuBy6gDBjNi3G-GL0GSuLKwEBXXJnYKxvgCkwyY00H5oyw9TC_jPYf1pVpO8ZqQeBBtUe5QYU8wpDfeysQEovCw4RCkewhL8P6koUUDD9OtxVXuvA24G6_zDSQn4sXKk/s1600/Amir-Khan-defeat-to-Danny-Garcia_2795696.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><br /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRDyQc5NwlP4KUuBy6gDBjNi3G-GL0GSuLKwEBXXJnYKxvgCkwyY00H5oyw9TC_jPYf1pVpO8ZqQeBBtUe5QYU8wpDfeysQEovCw4RCkewhL8P6koUUDD9OtxVXuvA24G6_zDSQn4sXKk/s1600/Amir-Khan-defeat-to-Danny-Garcia_2795696.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"> </a>To me, this is the essence of sport. With time and practice, most people can muster some sort of competence at most physical skills. But to truly <i>compete</i> requires an all-consuming commitment that leaves the person as emotionally vulnerable as they are physically formidable. That's the bravery in what elite athletes do. The goal must be pursued with a deranged urgency, even though sporting achievement is ultimately as arbitrary as anything else. Commitment is scary, it's much easier to hold something back so you can pretend that if you fail, you never wanted that success in the first place. Elite athletes do not have this luxury.<br />
<br />
Take a look at this picture of Amir Khan from his possibly career-ending defeat last weekend. Yes, he was bruised and battered, but so what? Boxers look like that even after fights that they win. It's his bewildered expression rather than the blood on his face that makes me wonder what the hell I'm doing with my life.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRDyQc5NwlP4KUuBy6gDBjNi3G-GL0GSuLKwEBXXJnYKxvgCkwyY00H5oyw9TC_jPYf1pVpO8ZqQeBBtUe5QYU8wpDfeysQEovCw4RCkewhL8P6koUUDD9OtxVXuvA24G6_zDSQn4sXKk/s1600/Amir-Khan-defeat-to-Danny-Garcia_2795696.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="169" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRDyQc5NwlP4KUuBy6gDBjNi3G-GL0GSuLKwEBXXJnYKxvgCkwyY00H5oyw9TC_jPYf1pVpO8ZqQeBBtUe5QYU8wpDfeysQEovCw4RCkewhL8P6koUUDD9OtxVXuvA24G6_zDSQn4sXKk/s320/Amir-Khan-defeat-to-Danny-Garcia_2795696.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div>
<span style="background-color: white;">I don't think physical pain really registers that much with viewers anymore. Most people have no clue just how much effort it takes to break away from the peloton on an Alpine climb, or how hard it is for an injury-addled footballer to play through pain. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;">But I think most of us 'get' psychological pain. Most of us know what it's like to want something (or someone), to try to achieve it but still to come up short. Likewise, many of us also know how frustrating it can be to achieve what you've worked so hard for, only to find that you feel absolutely nothing when you hold it in your hands.<br /><br />When that documentary finished last night, I thought about how pointless most fictional narratives seem in comparison, especially if they are sports related. Sport needs a dramatized fictional narrative like the sun needs tinsel to 'brighten it up a bit'.</span>RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-15918370519643485862012-04-03T15:23:00.005+01:002012-04-03T15:50:45.116+01:00All models are wrong, but some are useful.<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Economists are often mocked for the assumptions we make in our models. People accuse of us surging ahead with elegant computations, forgetting that our entire analysis rests on some wholly implausible assumptions. Well, yes, these assumptions are often totally ridiculous. And yes, given their general contribution to the financial crisis, the macroeconomists of the last 20 years have got a hell of a lot to answer for. But, a good model, humbly deployed, can still be useful despite it's implausible assumptions.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">A model is just a system of hypothetical propositions. A model is to Economics what the word 'if' is to Philosophy. Imagine if every time a philosopher said 'if' they were shouted down by everyone else because their 'if' simply wasn't true. 'If' is a bloody useful concept. "All models are wrong, but some are useful", said the statistician George Box. We know the assumptions we make are frequently implausible, but that doesn't make the results of our models useless. The tedious stereotype implies we economists believe these assumptions to be true, or will assume anything to reach some predetermined conclusion. I would suggest the opposite, that</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> </span><i><span style="font-size: 11pt;">economists deliberately propose false assumptions in order to try and prove their theories to be false</span></i><span style="font-size: 11pt;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Take the following statement:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Grammar schools and selection on ability only benefits the children of the wealthiest families because ability is so highly correlated with SES (socioeconomic status)."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">You might agree or disagree with this statement and God knows plenty of people have a view. But to actually know whether this is true requires the analysis of several phenomena at once. Grammar schools likely increase the access to quality schooling for high ability children in poor neighbourhoods. They also probably harm the children remaining in those poor neighbourhoods as their more able peers leave them behind. Then again, schools in poorer neighbourhoods might be able to better target their teaching at their remaining students, so this segregation by ability could help the less able and so on.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">Proper, objective analysis of this issue becomes very complicated very quickly using language alone (or as an economist would say, both the first and second derivatives of complexity with respect to language used are positive). Each of the statements I made in the previous paragraph can be articulated more precisely with algebra. You can sit in the pub all day long and argue about which of the above effects is the strongest, but persuasive anecdotes skilfully delivered with elegant rhetoric can't deal with internal theoretical inconsistencies in the way maths can. For this reason, the evolutionary biologist J. B. S. Haldane said "an ounce of algebra is worth a ton of verbal argument". Words can paint a picture and give you the perspective of the artist, maths can build a 3D (or more) model that can be manipulated and examined from any angle we like.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">With this example, a mathematical model could articulate the conditions that would </span><i style="font-size: 11pt;">have to be true</i><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> for selection on ability to benefit children from poorer families. Say we assumed, for the sake of computational simplicity, that all parents were aware of all possible schools they could send their children to. Ignore, just for the moment, the likely scenario that high SES parents will be more informed of their choices. Now let us suppose show that even if this assumption were true, our model showed that allowing all schools to select on ability would cause such strong social segregation that the implied necessary improvement in teaching quality for less able pupils in poorer areas was implausibly large.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;">The initial implausible assumption was there to provide the ideal scenario for some hypothesis to be true, just as engineers initially simulate plane designs in frictionless skies. If, given that ‘ideal world’ assumption, that plane doesn’t fly, or the theoretical model generates implausible results, then we can probably ditch that design or rule out that hypothesis altogether. The model was wrong, but it was also useful.</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div>RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-51463078252890812792012-03-04T23:23:00.023+00:002012-11-20T11:26:58.965+00:00Drive, the Artist and Annie HallA week ago I decided my daily afternoon naps were getting a bit weird and that, for the sake of my PhD at least, I should start drinking coffee again. Since then I've been reading journal papers like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj-qBUWOYfE" target="_blank">Johnny Five</a>, mumbling 'Innnnn-puuuut' while dribbling through my gurning chops.<br />
<br />
Caffeine hits me hard, I've been off it since 2007. Back when I traded European stocks, I started work at 6am. This meant getting up at 5am and downing 2 coffees by sunrise just to jolt me into coherence. Then I moved to the US shift (12-9.30pm) and due to an abundance of sleep, I just kind of gave up. Ever since then, the merest whiff of caffeine has had me rocking back and forth in sweats. So, this week, some of you may have noticed a higher than normal tweeting frequency, an added adamance to the crap I usually talk and an all round more intense demeanor.<br />
<br />
Or maybe you didn't. Who knows. I'm told I go on a bit, but that all in all, it's part of my charm. I've always wished I was a quieter person, but it's not in me. If I'm enjoying conversation, I'm happy for it to go on for hours. I insist people watch my favourite documentaries like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7RT-Zc9wIY&feature=related" target="_blank">Hoop Dreams</a>, (or <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDbyILj7o-w" target="_blank">Senna</a>, or <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzj-vb7Lj0A" target="_blank">Hands On A Hard Body</a>) or listen to Talk Talk's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xd4XDoVQRbE" target="_blank">Spirit of Eden</a>. I think drinking coffee has intensified this behavior this week, but then I'm not too sure, I've been too wired to reach a considered judgement.<br />
<br />
Sometimes, I wish I could be more reserved, more silent, and leave everyone else wondering what I'm thinking. But I'm not that kind of a guy and most of the time, I'm fine with that. A week ago, I was especially reassured by my second viewing of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBzHphcc2Jw" target="_blank">Annie Hall</a>. Now, obviously I am not claiming to be as witty as Woody Allen, but it was great to see a beautiful woman like Diane Keaton fall in love with a skinny neurotic guy who can't stop talking.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUSeOFmKJVjLsAn9SOMpISBMhgfL4l_gsPEB4VbQBJFVuPv1H68vj9VzPkqMR-v-fYg5yrD8vBgZPMM_igjyJt05fIRa-kHElIU4owtA-W1cXx1aVbfXQdR__8Tm_U3Hbsso5kos1HkFY/s1600/annie-hall-balcony-with-alvy-subtitles1_scruberthumbnail_0.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUSeOFmKJVjLsAn9SOMpISBMhgfL4l_gsPEB4VbQBJFVuPv1H68vj9VzPkqMR-v-fYg5yrD8vBgZPMM_igjyJt05fIRa-kHElIU4owtA-W1cXx1aVbfXQdR__8Tm_U3Hbsso5kos1HkFY/s400/annie-hall-balcony-with-alvy-subtitles1_scruberthumbnail_0.jpeg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Alvy Singer... here's a guy I can relate to. He doesn't really know what the hell he is doing, makes jokes in inappropriate situations and gets wound up over nearly everything while carrying an air of genuine "damn it all we're all gonna die anyway" irreverence... and he can't park for shit either. A friend of mine said she thought I was just like him. I was tremendously flattered. After that, I had a good week.<br />
<br />
Last night (also for the second time) I saw <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWX34ShfcsE" target="_blank">Drive</a>, a magnificent film with a beautiful<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb0lYVyDYxs" target="_blank"> soundtrack</a>. But good grief, I say more in my sleep than Ryan Gosling does in the whole film. I'm sitting there watching it thinking, "Is this what women want?" He more or less just sits there, bulky-chested, wonky-jawed and boss-eyed, like a roided-up Rodney Trotter that's just munched an ice cream tub full of Valium. Gosling, referred to as 'The Kid' is basically exactly that, a child. At least the <i>actual</i> kid next door (that Gosling befriends) occasionally proffers some sort of cartoon based view on the world. Gosling's only response is to knowingly clench his jaw. I wish I could do that, carry that air of strong silence, but I'm scared if I just stared dead ahead, saying absolutely nothing, people would just think I was plain weird.<br />
<br />
Don't get me wrong, I loved the film. I like a doomed love story. I like a protagonist that bears his cross with a silent dignity. I love all that shit. But I'm not too thrilled about the current love for men who have nothing to offer but their bodies. Gosling says nothing, while occasionally smashing someone's face in with a hammer for the sake of the woman he loves.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.analoghype.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/drive-movie-2-2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="212" src="http://www.analoghype.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/drive-movie-2-2011.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> "</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Don't worry. We can walk to the curb from here."</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Meanwhile, everyone goes batshit crazy over the Artist, a 90 minute tantrum from a recently redundant performing monkey. We no longer watch silent films for a reason. Yeah, there's a novelty to it, I grant you that. But it's just a novelty. Serve me a bacon sandwich with no bacon in it at all and I will temporarily reconsider my conception of the sandwich. But once is enough.<br />
<br />
There's more to being a man than violently protecting women and nodding sagely at fatherless children. We're not here for the benefit of other people's amusement and the tortuous process of understanding our existence is not one giant slapstick performance. Sure, some things are better left unsaid. Sometimes a silence can be deafening. But just staring wistfully into space shouldn't necessarily imply that someone is thinking something profound, or that there is something profound to be thought. Sometimes, I suspect filmmakers are just using the ambiguity that such silence provides as a substitute for actual ideas.<br />
<br />
Give me a sandwich with actual <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeqbRbAyC4M" target="_blank">bacon</a> in it, any day of the week.RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-86189864111539014492011-12-11T01:16:00.014+00:002011-12-11T09:08:59.110+00:00Bingo WingsMy friend found an insanely sincere old e-mail I sent him and said he thought, in retrospect, that it was funny. I've copied it below and yeah, it is funny. But I still believe every word and I'm pretty sure I gave this exact same speech to some poor bastard on Friday night. <br />
<br />
But you know, if I believe it, then I believe it. <br />
<br />
The context is... I said doing an <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwpPh42SiD4&feature=fvst" target="_blank">IronMan</a> was a spiritual experience. Now, I am not the sort of person that uses the word 'spiritual' sparingly. I have walked out of yoga classes because the instructor referred to the 'spirituality' of the people in the room. Manufactured collective sentiment makes me nauseous, which is why I hate going to gigs. But anyway, my friend said there was nothing spiritual about a triathlon, it's just a bunch of people in weird clothes performing a difficult but ultimately trivial task. <br />
<br />
Well, by any definition of spirituality I have read, I disagree and maintain what I say below.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;"></div>I should also point out that I kind of plagiarized some of this from '<a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3715868384598603316" target="_blank">Hands on a Hard Body</a>', a beautiful documentary about mental strength and probably my favorite film ever.<br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px;">I just saw this email from you, well funny:</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; text-align: left;">Nothing is spiritual when described in those terms. You could call bathing in the Ganges "dipping your ankles in some shitty water" or a pilgrimage to Mecca as "a long hot walk to some dustbowl". And agreed, there is nothing spiritual about running on a treadmill. Or eating liquid sugar. Or buying a carbon fibre bike. But, like Lance Armstrong said, it's not about the bike, it's about the soul of the person riding it. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; text-align: left;">"‘I had learned what it means to ride the Tour de France. It’s not about the bike. It’s a metaphor for life, not only the longest race in the world but also the most exalting and heartbreaking and potentially tragic. It poses every conceivable element to the rider, and more: cold, heat, mountains, plains, ruts, flat tires, high winds, unspeakable bad luck, unthinkable beauty, yawning senselessness, and above all, a great deep self-questioning. During our lives we’re faced with so many different elements as well, we experience so many setbacks, and fight such a hand-to-hand battle with failure, head down in the rain, just trying to stay upright and to have a little hope."</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; text-align: left;">I agree with that 100%. Maybe its trite, maybe its laughable, but I don't care. You look at cycling and you see some fit guys in stupid outfits pushing wheels round. I see guys who are at their pain threshold, looking inside themselves to see who they really are. There's no knowing irony, or pretending that we didn't really care in the first place. The layers of bullshit that most people, especially myself, project outwards on a daily basis are blown away. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; text-align: left;">And that's the thing about IronMan or the Tour de France or whatever. It is so insanely fucking hard that when you compete you are vulnerable. You are putting yourself on the line. It is brave and not a lot of people want to take that sort of risk, expose themselves like that. To me, the underlying pointlessness of the whole endeavor only magnifies it's beauty. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; text-align: left;">p.s. When I googled Mecca, the first listing was Mecca Bingo.</span>RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-15084659595822406902011-12-02T10:25:00.003+00:002011-12-02T11:52:52.468+00:00It's just so OBVIOUSIt's just so obvious, I'm amazed everyone else is just so bloody thick they can't see it. It must be because they haven't read as much as me.<br />
<br />
NARRATIVE A<br />
<br />
The Coalition government are hell bent on finishing off what Thatcher started by rolling back the public sector to fund ideologically driven tax cuts. This is taking money out of the economy just when higher government spending is exactly what's needed. This means we're heading into another recession, which means we'll end up borrowing even more than we were before. The government have no idea about basic macroeconomics, Nobel Laureates <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/bleeding-britain/" target="_blank">Paul Krugman</a> and Joseph Stiglitz have been warning for years that the austerity experiment will not only fail, but ruin Britain's economy for the next decade.<br />
<br />
But the Tories don't care. All they care about is protecting the wealth of their core voters, the rich. The injustice is all the more infuriating seeing as it was the bankers that caused the financial crisis in the first place, yet they still seem to be doing just fine. The rich protect the rich, they couldn't care less about everyone else. So public sector workers do the only thing they can to protect themselves, they strike... and so they should. They're the ones who look after the poor, the sick, the needy and they've done nothing to cause any of this. It is the clearest case of Right vs Wrong since, well, since ever.<br />
<br />
But then on the other hand...<br />
<br />
NARRATIVE B<br />
<br />
Striking public sector workers are taking the piss. They've got more generous pensions than their equivalents in the private sector and its the tax revenues from the private sector that actually pay for them. It used to be the case that you got less money for working in the public sector because you had extra job security. Now, despite the approaching redundancies, the public sector have greater job security AND a pay premium. In the private sector, workers have been getting their pay cut if they're lucky enough to just not lose their job. So, public sector people, you want more money? Yeah, no shit, don't we all.<br />
<br />
The government just HAS to cut spending. The bond markets wanted a signal that spending was going to be brought under control. Clegg flipped from his pre election position because he believed he simply had no choice. Anyone who doesn't understand that doesn't grasp basic game theory. Veteran investors like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B611_TJannA" target="_blank">Jim Rogers</a> and <a href="http://articles.businessinsider.com/2010-01-27/markets/30083495_1_interest-rates-uk-pile" target="_blank">Bill Gross</a> warned that investors were close to losing faith in the British government. You only have to look at what's going on in Greece, Italy and the rest of Europe to see what happens if you don't placate the bond markets.<br />
<br />
Taxing the bankers is one solution, but if they all move to Hong Kong, the government will be getting 60% of nothing instead of whatever they collect now. Besides, the top 1% of income tax earners are already <a href="http://www.cityam.com/news-and-analysis/allister-heath/it-s-time-abolish-the-50p-tax-rate" target="_blank">paying over 25% of all income tax revenues</a>. Given the choice of funding generous public sector pensions or cutting income tax for the low paid, I'd go for the latter.<br />
<br />
WHICH ONE TO CHOOSE?<br />
<br />
Either, they are both plausible. Believing one over the other doesn't make you intelligent or ignorant. There is plenty of evidence out there to support either argument and I don't think the morality of one position is obviously superior to the other.<br />
<br />
Now, I love Twitter and Facebook as sources of information. Twitter knows everything before I do and Facebook is a great way to keep in touch with all my friends in London now that I live in Bristol. But this week, the only thing I've learnt is how much my teacher friends hate bankers/Tories, and how much my banker/entrepreneur friends hate the unions. <br />
<br />
Perversely, now that we all communicate via Twitter and Facebook and can talk to almost anyone, we increasingly only hear from the people we agree with. Sure, some of us follow the odd journo from the other side, just to stay informed. But, I'm betting most of us mainly click on links from the people we already agree with. Your Facebook homepage now runs off an algorithm that gives increased prominence to friends whose links you click on more regularly. So the more someone posts something you want to read, the more you hear from them.<br />
<br />
This is a problem. The more we hear an opinion, the more we believe it. Psychological research shows that we confuse repeated information with new information (among others... <a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/2489329" target="_blank">Hawkins & Hoch, 1992</a>; <a href="http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic470237.files/articles%20spring%202008/Judgement%20under%20uncertainty%20readings/availability.pdf" target="_blank">Kahneman & Tversky, 1973</a>). Someone tells you something twice, you believe it more the second time, even though its the same information. More to the point, if person A tells you something and person B tells you the same, you tend to treat person B's information as 'new'. You will do this even if you know person B found this information out from person A in the first place. Anyone who has ever spread or heard gossip (i.e. everyone) should be familiar with this phenomenon.<br />
<br />
As much as I love Twitter and Facebook, they are more or less a never ending stream of opinions, skewed towards the viewpoint you already have. The same goes for any news source. We tend to think that just because we're spending lots of time collecting information, we're actually learning something 'new'. Actually, most of the time, we're just hearing repetitions. These repetitions make us more certain we're right, when we're often no more informed than we were at the start. Its like the example I gave above of persons A and B, but its happening thousands of times a day in a network so complex we can't even begin to compute its underlying structure and therefore the true value of the 'new' information we are receiving.<br />
<br />
If we acknowledge that we vastly overstate our certainty, then we can shrug our shoulders and admit that in truth, we're not really too sure about exactly what is 'right' and 'wrong'. We might then be able to talk to each other with a bit more humility and without making any wild conclusive statements. <br />
<br />
But then I suppose, where would be the fun in that?RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2392207210450121814.post-24576444783143678622011-09-20T19:37:00.010+01:002012-07-19T11:31:55.368+01:00There is a Lamp that's now going outI found myself quite moved by Henry Winter's <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/8775400/Henry-Winter-time-for-Frank-Lampard-to-reinvent-himself-as-Chelsea-anchorman.html">piece on Frank Lampard</a>'s poor form in the Telegraph this morning. If you're not bothered about football, then at face value, its not particularly interesting. I know this. But it got me thinking about how hard it must be for an elite athlete to come to terms with their physical decline.<br />
<br />
I wondered if Frank Lampard lies awake at night thinking about death, or not being able to play football anymore, or whether he considers them to be the same thing. He probably doesn't. Quietly intelligent, he appears to be psychologically robust enough to adapt to a new life. Then again, how the hell would I know? I've never met him (though I did once see him in a casino with John Virgo, who was actually wearing a snooker-themed waistcoat like he used to on Big Break).<br />
<br />
I admit I have no idea what goes through Frank Lampard's mind, I guess this post is more about me than him. When I woke up this morning, my right knee (my good one) was still swollen and sore from my Sunday League game. I've gradually come to terms with the fact that these aren't temporary injuries. The pain and stiffness can be temporarily alleviated, but my body is essentially decaying. So is Frank Lampard's and I'm just guessing that as distressing as I find this trend, it must be even harder for him.<br />
<br />
With his Premier League record of 164 consecutive outfield appearances, Lampard is one of the most formidable athletes to have ever played the game. Ferguson called him a 'freak'. Former coaches say he wasn't a natural talent either. He worked for it, as hard as any player in modern football. Three years ago, Capello told Lampard "You are in the moment of your life". No doubt he meant to say something else, but I still think this was a truly beautiful way of describing an elite athlete at the peak of their career. Nothing else will compare.<br />
<br />
But now its all drifting away from him. Of course this has happened to other players countless times before, but none that I consider the same generation as myself. At 31, I'm only two years younger than Lampard. My friends and colleagues have visibly aged over the years, but its easy to convince yourself that they don't eat and rest properly, or that they drink too much. But its not really possible to do that with Frank Lampard. If he can't do what he used to, then I definitely can't. Its just so final, it scares the shit out of me.<br />
<br />
This must be something that all sports fans go through. The first time you see someone younger than you play top level sport, its a shock. Something gets hammered home... "See that kid on the TV? That's not you. It's never going to be you." Then again, I was always rubbish at sport but strong academically, so it wasn't exactly a devastating blow when Gerrard (three months my junior) leapfrogged me into the England starting XI. But now I'm watching men my age being superseded by a new generation and frankly its harder to stomach than Gerrard's England debut. It's not about getting older per se. I don't care that I don't know anything about modern music, I'm sure it wouldn't be that hard to learn about it. But what Lampard and Gerrard are now coming to terms with is that their physical vitality has been clipped. Permanently.<br />
<br />
I wonder if this is why the likes of Ryan Giggs and Sachin Tendulkar are universally popular. Tendulkar truly is a 'freak'. He has a few grey hairs, but he more or less looks the same as the chubby 16 year-old who cheerfully batted on with a bouncer bloodied nose in his debut series against Pakistan. One of the few enjoyable moments for Indian cricket fans this summer were the warm receptions Sachin received on his walks out to the middle. I'm sure the crowd were mainly cheering a wonderful batsman who has been a joy to watch over the years, but I think one of the reasons we love him so much is his sheer stubborn refusal to get older. As long as he pretends he's still 16, we can too. He's batting, we're watching... nothing has changed.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/LfpqrouqosU?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />
Giggs is different. A few years ago, everyone had written him off. The conventional wisdom was that he'd had too many injuries, he couldn't survive without his pace. Wenger almost certainly would have given him a testimonial and sent him on his way. But the wonder of Ryan Giggs is not that he is still exploding down the wing like he did when he was 16, but that he courageously reinvented himself when he should have been growing new chins and getting pally with ex-pros in the Sky Sports studios. Tendulkar's 30s were a dream-like miracle because we were watching a boy who would live forever. Giggs' yoga-aided latter career on the other hand is nothing less than a resurrection. I wonder how many ex-players struggle to come to terms with life as just a regular human being. I imagine they must have dreams where, like Ryan Giggs, they can suddenly play again.<br />
<br />
I saw an interview with Giggs recently where he was shown a goal he scored back in 1994. He looked a little shocked and Martin Tyler asked him what was wrong. He said he thought he could remember every goal he'd ever scored, but he just didn't recognize the scenes he was watching at all. In many ways that's because he's just scored so many over such a lengthy career and that should be cause for celebration. But you could see he was rattled, that it occurred to him that when ex-pros say "Well, at least you'll always have the memories", that might not necessarily be true, that while 20 years of professional football is beyond the wildest dreams of even the most deluded kid, on his deathbed, it will feel like it all flashed by in a heartbeat.RChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14593163851638477319noreply@blogger.com0